His policy address has launched a series of measures EYi property market, but not seen significant results. The reality is more and more people have realized the value of the dollar has not fate, hold and dollars hook hk dollar, will only end up with the same fate to the dollar, so have turned the physical assets, and reduce the Hong Kong dollar, real estate and become a lot of people money shelters. The global environment, small a Hong Kong government is immutable. Therefore, has not yet home buyers of the Hong Kong people, should not be expected government would have what effective measures, enough to make property prices in the short term obviously down-regulated; And the men of the tower of today can't afford, in the near future can afford. Property prices in the short term look down, may look rather than the more difficult. Unless the government will dial the part of their land and define the development out of the building, and only for locals first-time home buyers to purchase, or are not easily isolated from the foreign investment factors on local property prices distorted. I this suggestion, in fact just ask the government to society to provide a no discount hos it, its market intervention than before the degree of the hos less, how can affect Hong Kong as a financial centre status? And execute never difficult, is modeled hos....... I don't understand why the government that doesn't work! Currently, the social public opinion blindly urged the government to strengthen the suppression of the strength of the measures, but most of the Suggestions are not new, but is required (I) reduce mortgage into modules, (ii) increasing mortgage interest rate, and (iii) increase stamp duty, (iv) to transfer the property short-term impose punitive value-added tax, etc. However, these measures with common side effects, is to have already been home buyers difficult ordinary citizens, more can't afford to buy building, it is the food of arsenic quer-civorus tiger. Reduce mortgage down direct effect, are you going to buy the floor of the people have to raise more the first period, the result is had the people buying a home, they also become can't afford floor. For these people, the government is not in help them, but in touch them, they will appreciate how the government? As for was managed by the hkma come forward, prompted Banks to increase mortgage rates, more with Hong Kong is still in the small business owners for building for the enemy, the environment is really cheap today have just one in decades. Quantitative loose make bank water baptism, in order to lend them money, interest rates between Banks have to compete against each other. Consumers can reduce the burden for building, equal have more money for other consumption, which can improve the living, and can be active economy. The government is stronger Banks raise interest rates, not destroy the good citizens? Impose punitive short-term transfer tax, can reduce ChaoGu profits, not completely scare off ChaoGu entering the market, severely punished ChaoGu perhaps can relieve the no opportunity to fry floor of the day by profit affair, but also may lead to short term ChaoGu into long term investors, and the plate after in time, make the market sell dish less, so that property prices rose more urgent. These measures, if double strength words, there might be some cooling effect, but this kind of surface cooling, is what the government resistance, rather than help the result of buying a home, how will the citizens of real estate for want to bring good? Perhaps, the government feel when the housing excessive heat resistance people buying a home, can help people escaped unscathed of bubble burst; But for the future, and the government is not accurate prediction ability; Now may be made quantitative easing is of a right choice, the government suppression of city measures instead destroyed citizens to protect themselves. Which on the most correct item choice, in fact before announced, god only knows; What should the government do it for someone else?