What is more, some people think that the government is using send cash to confuse people, let them temporarily forget that high prices. 2 it is new immigrants and 18 years old of the following citizens unable to benefit, and this part of the crowd on the need to relieve. And the original MPF scheme to the capital injection, things may let the real benefit from new immigrants. Now send the money is quite satisfied with the most Hong Kong people. However, the Hong Kong budget of the teaching of the adjustment is obvious. The government of people don't know enough about expected before, although the government held more than a hearing, and government officials seem to slow the urgent needs of the people. In addition, the Hong Kong government to deal with house prices was not strong enough, the main land lies in financial restricted the government can choose policy set. Although Hong Kong and Singapore all kinds of conditions is very similar, Singapore's per capita residential area is much larger than Hong Kong. Singapore is do better, is the land by effective control financial.

To view LaoRen, LaoPan disproved said there are reasonable, and legitimacy of land reserves, it is normal. But many developers have more than 20 years of land reserves, the highest of which has more than 100 years! LaoPan ask, "just think, if someone in order to toilet reserves of more than 100 years of toilet paper, cause the market surged to a toilet paper, isn't that normal?" Debate so far, make us these onlookers can't help baffled. Both are developer, two people are big boss, two people think they have a thought, it also say such day sent to don't, different words, you call us these layman, what should I believe anyone? But LaoPan suffused brain, the public questions, he said: "' and there is much to be said on both sides', the solution is??????? Is very simple, can make each city land management department must be in their own web sites, release all the has sent the land card" specific data... exactly who, according to the store, how many have not developed area, be clear at a glance." LaoPan called on: "open and transparent" compared to the supervision of the camera obscura, of course more fair and more transparent. I didn't understand, why can't put all the land transfer information on online? This will is very simple, it's not multifarious." Debate so far, Richard seems to stand to LaoPan side again. You said the developers didn't hoard land, I say developers stockpiled huge land, who's the boss? Let the facts, the land situation all public, not the truth to light? Right ah, LaoPan, this time, let's listen to you, everyone together questioned the land administration department: why not open information? So a simple things, is what waited, you really afraid of? Well, well! Well? !